Follow us on:
follow Sudhakar on Twitter Become a fan on FB Follow TNC on linkedin Follow THE NEW CONSTRUCTS on You Tube
  1158 Fans on FB
Login    Register    Contact Us

Post your Answer

Q.
"Neither a borrower nor a lender be" - why was Shakespeare against making money on money ?
A.
Because he was Islamic

shilpad10

Tue, 08/12/2009 - 01:08

Report abuse

A.
On Polonius's terms, there is little to argue with in his perhaps ungenerous advice. His logic is thus: lending money to friends is risky, because hitching debt onto personal relationships can cause resentment and, in the case of default, loses the lender both his money and his friend. Borrowing invites more private dangers: it supplants domestic thrift ("husbandry")—in Polonius's eyes, an important gentlemanly value. Incidentally, in the days when Hamlet was first staged, borrowing was epidemic among the gentry, who sometimes neglected husbandry to the point where they were selling off their estates piece by piece to maintain an ostentatious lifestyle in London.

saravanan

Sun, 06/12/2009 - 06:00

Report abuse

Your Answer

Disclaimer: Messages posted on this Web site under the `Comments' area are solely the opinions of those who have posted them and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of The New Constructs website or its anchor. Gossip, mud slinging and malicious attacks on individuals and organizations are strictly prohibited. TheNewConstructs.com can not be held responsible for errors or omissions in content, nor for the authenticity of the user/company name or email addresses associated with posted messages. TheNewConstructs reserves the right to edit or remove messages containing inappropriate language or any other material that could be construed as libelous, potentially libelous, or otherwise offensive or inappropriate. TheNewConstructs.com do not endorse the products and services or any other offerings that may be mentioned in these messages.
Post It
© 2010, All rights reserved